Cycle & timing detail周期与时机详情
Momentum across timeframes跨周期动量
🔮 Outlook & AI view🔮 前瞻与 AI 观点
⚖️ AI judgment — accountable leanAI 研判 — 可问责判断
🧠 AI brief — research contextAI 简报 — 研究背景
📊 Fundamentals & financials📊 基本面与财务
🧭 Demand context — is the rally already priced?需求背景 — 涨势是否已被定价?
?A framing of WHERE a rally's demand story sits, in three honest layers. (1) Trailing = demand that already converted to financials — backward-looking by accounting construction. (2) Consensus = the forward view the market has ALREADY bought (forward P/E, next-quarter estimate, analyst revisions, SUE); agreeing with it is exposure, not edge, because it is already in the price. (3) Independent observable = a management-independent read on FORWARD demand (bookings/backlog, customer-capex, hiring) — the only layer that could say a rally is MIS-priced. It is not yet measured (Phase 1 of the Demand Desk). DISPLAY-ONLY context; nothing here is a buy signal.用三个诚实的层次界定涨势的“需求故事”所处位置。(1) 历史=已转化为财报的需求——按会计口径天然滞后。(2) 共识=市场已经买入的前瞻预期(前瞻市盈率、下季预估、分析师评级调整、SUE);认同它只是承担敞口而非优势,因为它已被定价。(3) 独立观测=对前瞻需求、不依赖管理层口径的读数(订单/在手订单、客户资本开支、招聘)——这是唯一可能判断涨势被错误定价的层次。该层尚未度量(需求台第一阶段)。仅作背景展示,均非买入信号。
💲 Valuation估值
?Trailing multiples from the latest SEC filing divided by the current price. The bar shows how cheap or expensive the name is versus its own GICS sector (green = cheaper, marker = sector median). Forward P/E is only available for a deep set of large caps; every other name shows trailing only — we never impute a forward number.历史估值倍数=最新SEC财报÷当前股价。条形显示相对其所属行业的便宜或昂贵程度(绿色=更便宜,标记=行业中位)。前瞻市盈率仅对部分大盘股可得,其余仅显示历史值——我们绝不臆造前瞻数字。
📊 Financials & growth财务与增长
?Latest fiscal year from SEC EDGAR XBRL; multi-year trends, growth (CAGR) and the Piotroski-F / Altman-Z health scores from SEC companyfacts. All lagged to the filing date. Diluted EPS is as-reported — not split-adjusted across years.最新财年来自SEC EDGAR XBRL;多年趋势、增长(CAGR)与 Piotroski-F/Altman-Z 健康分数来自SEC companyfacts。均滞后至申报日。摊薄EPS为申报口径,未跨年做拆股调整。
more metrics & financial health更多指标与财务健康
🧾 Accounting quality会计质量
?A plain-language read on whether the accounting is deteriorating — composed from this name's accruals (are earnings backed by cash?), working-capital trends (inventory & receivables vs sales), gross profitability, capital discipline (asset growth / dilution) and balance-sheet safety, using the same SEC-derived factor ranks shown below plus multi-year SEC companyfacts trends where they exist. DISPLAY-ONLY context: it is NOT part of any score, ranking or trading signal, and it deliberately does NOT change the technical / alpha call above — it is a fundamental cross-check for you to weigh. Lagged to the filing date; annual data, sparse for some filers.用通俗语言判断会计质量是否在恶化——综合该标的的应计利润(盈利是否有现金支撑)、营运资本趋势(存货与应收对销售)、毛利能力、资本纪律(资产增长/股本稀释)与资产负债表安全性,即下方相同的 SEC 因子排名,并在可得时叠加 SEC companyfacts 多年趋势。仅作背景展示:不计入任何评分、排名或交易信号,且刻意不改变上方的技术/阿尔法判断——它只是供你权衡的基本面交叉验证。滞后至申报日;年度数据,对部分公司不全。
⚠ Great-company-trap check优质公司陷阱检查
?Three independent de-escalation legs applied to high-quality names: (1) Basket-level crowding — is the theme this stock belongs to showing elevated institutional co-movement / extension? (2) Net insider selling — are insiders selling net > $500k? (3) Analyst consensus downgrading — is the net-buy count declining? Any firing leg is a caution flag only (never a sell or a score input). DISPLAY-ONLY context — does not affect any score, rank, or entry decision (LH-R10).针对高质量标的的三个独立降级腿:(1) 篮子层面拥挤——该股所属主题是否出现机构共振或超延伸?(2) 内部人净卖出——内部人净卖出是否超过50万美元?(3) 分析师共识下调——净买入计数是否在下降?任何触发腿仅为谨慎提示(从不作为卖出信号或评分输入)。仅供展示——不影响任何评分、排名或入场决策(LH-R10)。
🗓 Event windows事件窗口
?Upcoming event-calendar context for this name: next earnings date (calendar days away), next FOMC meeting (calendar days away), and the most recent EDGAR balance-sheet debt snapshot (current debt due within ~12 months, long-term debt, cash, net debt). DISPLAY-ONLY context — descriptive facts only, does not affect any score, rank, or entry decision. Debt figures in USD as reported; lagged to the most recent SEC filing date shown.当前标的即将到来的事件日历背景:下次财报日期(距今日历天数)、下次FOMC会议(距今日历天数),以及最新EDGAR资产负债表债务快照(约12个月内到期的流动债务、长期债务、现金、净债务)。仅供展示——纯描述性事实,不影响任何评分、排名或入场决策。债务数据为美元报告值,滞后至所示最新SEC申报日期。
📅 Earnings财报
?Next reported earnings date and the recent beat/miss history (SEC + Nasdaq, keyless), plus the SUE earnings-momentum z. SUE (standardized unexpected earnings) measures how far the latest quarter beat its year-ago seasonal expectation, standardized by the company's own history — the post-earnings-announcement-drift (PEAD) effect. It was the strongest factor and lone false-discovery-rate survivor on the shallow 2023-2025 window, but a deep 2011-2026 re-test (survivorship-biased, an optimistic bound) collapses its CROSS-SECTIONAL edge to ~zero (see the factors page) — so it is shown as earnings-momentum / PEAD context, not a validated standalone alpha; the z is RELATIVE to the S&P 1500 (0 = average, +2 = top of the pack). Context, not a standalone buy signal.下次财报日与近期超预期/不及预期历史(SEC+纳斯达克,免密钥),以及SUE盈利动量z值。SUE(标准化超预期盈利)衡量最新季度相对去年同期季节性预期超出多少,并以公司自身历史标准化——即盈利公布后漂移(PEAD)效应。它在浅窗口(2023-2025)曾是最强正向因子且唯一通过无泄漏错误发现率检验,但 2011-2026 深度复检(含幸存者偏差,乐观上界)使其横截面优势崩塌至约零(见因子页)——故仅作盈利动量/PEAD 背景展示,并非已验证的独立超额收益;该z为相对标普1500的排名(0=平均,+2=领先)。仅供参考,并非独立买入信号。
🧬 Factor fingerprint因子指纹
?Where this name sits on the canonical smart-beta factors versus the S&P 1500 cross-section (winsorized z-scores; 0 = average, +2 = top of the pack, bars right of centre = attractive). These are RELATIVE RANKS lagged to the latest filing — context, not a validated alpha and not a quality verdict.该标的在标普1500横截面上各经典smart-beta因子的位置(缩尾z分数;0=平均,+2=领先,条形位于中线右侧=有吸引力)。这些是滞后至最新财报的相对排名——仅供参考,并非已验证的超额收益或质量结论。
📈 Alpha vs sector & index相对板块与大盘的阿尔法
?This stock's return with its MARKET and SECTOR beta removed — sector-neutral residual momentum over a 12-1-month window (research/RESIDUAL_ALPHA_MOMENTUM.md). 'alpha z' is its rank vs the whole S&P 1500 cross-section (0 = average, +2 = top of the pack); 'sector rank' is its place among its GICS peers; 'idiosyncratic' is the annualized beta-stripped return. The entry tag flags whether a leader just spiked ('extended' = short-term reversal risk) or is on a recent dip ('pullback' = constructive). Phase-0 validated as a MODEST, regime-decayed edge — context for stock selection, not a standalone buy signal.该股票剔除其市场与板块贝塔后的收益 —— 12-1 个月的板块中性残差动量。“阿尔法 z”是其在整个标普1500横截面中的排名(0=平均,+2=领先);“板块排名”是其在 GICS 同业中的位次;“特异收益”为年化的剔除贝塔后收益。入场标签标记领跑股是刚急涨(“extended”=短期反转风险)还是处于近期回调(“pullback”=较佳入场)。第 0 阶段验证为温和、随周期衰减的优势 —— 仅为选股参考,并非独立买入信号。
🏦 Options, positioning & ownership🏦 期权、持仓与机构
🎯 Options & dealer gamma (GEX)期权与做市商Gamma
🩳 Positioning持仓与做空
?Short interest from FINRA (bi-monthly, ~2-week lag). Insider net open-market buying/selling from SEC Form-4 filings, shown as a % of market cap (size-normalised so small/mid-cap conviction is not drowned by megacap dollars) with the count of distinct insiders — a cluster of independent buyers is the higher-conviction signal. Heavy or rising short interest with insider selling is a caution.做空数据来自FINRA(每半月,约两周滞后)。内部人净公开市场买卖来自SEC Form-4申报,按占市值%显示(经规模标准化,避免小/中盘信念被大盘美元金额淹没),并附不同内部人人数——多名独立买家形成的集群信号确信度更高。高或上升的做空+内部人卖出为警示。
👔 Analyst & estimates分析师与预期
🐳 Thematic-fund flow — curated ETF baskets主题基金流 — 精选ETF篮子
?Which curated thematic/industry funds (SPDR sector, Global X) and actively managed funds (ARK) have been accumulating or trimming this stock, with mechanical creation/redemption flow and price moves stripped out. Conviction = the percentage POINTS of the fund's weight the manager actually committed. A real add from a sector specialist is a meaningful vote of confidence; pair it with the analyst & filings panels above. From the 🐳 Real fund moves board.哪些精选的主题/行业基金(SPDR 板块、Global X)与主动管理基金(ARK)一直在增持或减持该股,已剔除机械性的申购/赎回资金流与价格变动。信念 = 经理人实际投入的基金权重百分点。来自板块专业基金的真实增持是有意义的信心投票;请与上方的分析师与申报面板结合参考。数据来自 🐳 基金真实动作 看板。
⚠️ Crowded & fragile拥挤且脆弱
?A contrarian RISK flag: this name is at once a crowded leader (high relative-strength percentile), a crowded short (high days-to-cover in the latest FINRA snapshot), AND stretched well above its 50-day average. That conjunction is a fragile set-up — prone to a sharp unwind or short squeeze either way. DISPLAY-ONLY context, never in the conviction score: our Phase-0 found crowding carries NO forward-return edge (only a marginal, statistically-weak worse drawdown), and short interest has no point-in-time history to validate. Context on fragility, NOT a sell.一个逆向风险标记:该股同时是拥挤的领涨股(相对强弱百分位高)、拥挤的空头(最新 FINRA 快照中回补天数高),且远高于其 50 日均线。这种组合是一种脆弱形态 —— 易于双向剧烈回吐或逼空。仅作背景展示,绝不计入信念评分:我们的 Phase-0 发现拥挤本身没有前瞻收益优势(仅有边际且统计上微弱的更深回撤),且空头数据没有可供验证的时点历史。仅作脆弱性背景,而非卖出信号。
🏦 Super-investors — 13F holders超级投资者 — 13F 持仓
?Which curated super-investor funds (Berkshire, Pershing Square, Scion, Baupost, Viking, Tiger Global, etc.) reported holding this stock in their latest SEC Form 13F, and whether they initiated / added / trimmed / exited vs the prior quarter. Conviction = the position's share of that fund's reported US-equity book. 13F is QUARTERLY with a ~45-day lag — long-only US equity >= $100M only (no shorts, options detail, or non-US positions); CUSIPs are name-matched to tickers so some lines are hidden. CONTEXT on who holds it, NOT a buy list or a real-time signal.哪些精选的超级投资者基金(伯克希尔、潘兴广场、Scion、Baupost、Viking、老虎环球等)在最新的 SEC 13F 表中报告持有该股,以及相对上一季度是新建仓/加仓/减持/清仓。信念 = 该持仓在该基金所报美股组合中的占比。13F 为季度申报,约有 45 天滞后 —— 仅含美股多头持仓(≥1亿美元),不含空头、期权细节或非美持仓;CUSIP 通过名称匹配到代码,部分行可能缺失。仅作为「谁持有它」的背景,而非买入清单或实时信号。
🧬 How this stock trades这只股票的交易个性
How much to trust the state — measured 2000→2026这个状态有多可信 — 实测 2000→2026?Stocks drift up over a month from
every state (the market's long upward bias); the spread between states is small, and the
"scary" states measured slightly better forward returns — markets mean-revert and full
confirmation costs part of the bounce. Use the state for structure (cycle position,
confirmation checklist, invalidation level) and size positions instead of seeking certainty.
Typical dip = the median worst drop over the next month; bad-case dip = the
worst 1-in-10 month (10th percentile) — the drawdown lens matters more than average return for
risk states like UNCONFIRMED TURN, since the danger is the path, not the endpoint. (Measured
on equities at a 1-month horizon — crypto tails are fatter, so treat these as a floor on the risk.)从任何状态出发,股票在一个月内都倾向于上涨(市场长期向上的偏向);各状态之间的差距很小,而那些
"吓人"的状态实测前瞻收益反而略好 — 市场会均值回归,等到完全确认时已错过部分反弹。请把状态用于
结构判断(周期位置、确认清单、失效价位)并据此控制仓位,而非追求确定性。
典型回撤 = 未来一个月最大跌幅的中位数;最坏回撤 = 十分之一的最差月份(第10百分位)—
对于未确认转向这类风险状态,回撤视角比平均收益更重要,因为危险在于过程,而非终点。(基于股票的一个月
周期实测 — 加密货币的尾部更肥,故请将其视为风险下限。)
How to read this page: the verdict band is the one call; the timing line, fingerprint axes and evidence lanes are the supporting reads behind it; the collapsed sections hold the full detail. Everything here is display-only research context, never personalized investment advice — sizing is a risk-budget guide, not a recommendation.如何阅读本页:结论条是唯一的判断;时机行、画像轴与依据栏是其背后的支撑读数;折叠区块收纳完整明细。本页所有内容仅为研究性背景展示,并非个性化投资建议——仓位为风险预算参考,而非推荐。
Generated 2026-07-17 16:26 UTC · charts rendered in-house with
Lightweight Charts™ on our own price data · methodology & caveats: see any sector page footer.